dRobinson

March 2, 2009

on a Human Doing Pt 2

Filed under: Jesus Shaped Faith — DRobinson @ 5:48 pm
I watched Rob Roy last night. I love the scene where his wife goes to ask the Duke for help. She says:
It was not done for Your Grace but for his own honour, which he holds dearer than myself or his sons, his clan or kin, and for which I have oft chided him. But it is him and his way, and were he other, he would not be Robert Roy McGregor. ... And though I love his honour, it is but a moon-cast shadow to the love I bear him.
But I had forgotten the scene near the end where she does anything but "chide" him concerning his honor:
Robert: It was me who was wrong. You were right when you told me I must have it my own way. It's that which brought all this on us. I should have packed my pride and given Montrose his way. And all this has come on us, all this you have endured. ... Mary: And wrong would have been done you! Robert: And what of the wrong done you, wrong past bearing? Mary: No, not past bearing. ... Not if I have my Robert, and he has himself. And you would not, not if you had done a lesser man's bidding. 'Honour is the gift a man gives himself.' You told our boys that. Would you have stolen from yourself that what makes you Robert McGregor? Robert: Oh, my Mary. How fine you are to me. (more...)

February 28, 2009

on The Shack, by Paul Young

Filed under: Jesus Shaped Faith — DRobinson @ 5:15 pm
The Shack
I have read and loved the Shack. I agree with Young's critics, that we need to be discerning as we read anything. And as any analogy or parable breaks down when we stare too closely at the details, so the Shack is flawed. For example, I struggled in CS Lewis' "The Last Battle" when Aslan said "Your service to Tash was really service to me." That is so close to universalism, but it's not. I understand Lewis' point about God looking deeper than our actions, into our thoughts and intentions, past our labels into our real selves. I understand it, but I think I might not have said it just that way...
I see some aspects of the Shack much the same way. Young didn't intend to write a theological study of the persons of the trinity. He was describing via fantasy, a journey of the heart of a man back to the heart of the God who loves him. Two very positive aspects of the Shack have stuck with me. First is the beautiful way Young paints the relationship among the Trinity.  Our God -- Father, Son, Holy Spirit, one true, eternal God, the same in substance, equal in power and glory; although distinguished by their personal properties -- this Triunity since forever, have been in a heroic, intimate, loving fellowship. I love how Young brings this out. Jesus, equal in power and glory with Papa, is always deferring to and honoring Papa. And Sarayu, flitting across the pages, was always pointing to Jesus. Long before Creation, there was active love, in and among the persons of the Triune God. Just as Lewis captures the power and love of Jesus in Aslan, Young captures Trinitarian love and honor as has no other work of fiction I have read. The other sticky point for me was being reminded that since before the foundations of the earth, before I had ever done anything, before creation and the fall, sin and redemption, God knew me and fore-loved me.  I hit The Shack at a time when I was dry and had been dry for a long time. Young offered me a cup of cold water in Jesus name. The cup had a chip or two, and Young's hand shook a bit, maybe. But the water was the real thing, pointing me back to the God who loves me, who is especially fond of me.

February 20, 2009

A Human Doing Pt.1

Filed under: Jesus Shaped Faith — DRobinson @ 12:06 pm
I spent the weekend away from my routine on a retreat in the N. Georgia mountains. I help with the A-V tech on these retreats: DVDs, audio and video stuff. What I do in the background helps the presentation aspects of the retreat to go smoothly. Ours is not intended to be a highly polished approach, but I want us to avoid the ?cringe factor? in the A-V side of things. The media presentations should not be a point of disconnect but a support to the message. So what I do behind the scenes and the quality I bring to the weekend makes a real positive impact on the flow of the retreat, and I am happy to be able to bring that. I love a smooth transition! I came up in the early afternoon Thursday to get equipment set up, and make sure of how our gear would work in the meeting room. I enjoy working alone at this, tweaking this and trying that, working at getting things just right. That ?just right? can be an illusive mark, and striving for it is a blessing and a curse. Good work, doing well, and seeking excellence are, well ..., good. But because of the illusiveness of ?just right? I can get compulsive over the little details. On Friday during a period of alone time, I realized just how consumed I?d been all the past week with wires, mixers, video clips and the like. I?d spent far more time wrapping and re-wrapping cables than praying for the men coming to the retreat or thinking about my own heart?s condition or meditating on what Christ has done for me and is doing in me. Why is it that I find doing so much easier than being? Give me a task, and I?m on it, and do it well. Give me five hours (or thirty minutes) alone, and I get fidgety, needing something to do. Being a man of action is a good thing; being addicted to action is not. ?Addiction? may not be the right word, but it?s close. Even writing these blog posts is an activity, a task that I use to help myself tune in to my inner life. I wrote earlier about this same issue in terms of study vs. meditation. Study is doing; meditation is being. Meditation and prayer are to a large extent, hanging out with God, creating an environment where intimacy can grow. When I talk with other guys about our relationships with our wives -- uh ... how each of us relates to our own wife -- so many of us focus on what we have done for her more than how we have related to her. We expect the intimacy of doing sex without the intimacy of just being with her. I?m getting better at just spending time with Chris -- cigars on the deck help. I?ve begun to enjoy sitting and talking with or without an agenda. As Christians, we talk about a personal relationship with Jesus and intimacy with God. I always used to nod and agree, but had no experience of that. I understood the concept, but did not know the reality. And to say you understand about intimacy is like saying I understand sex: this part goes there and such; it?s not the same as knowing sexual intimacy with my dear wife, Chris. I want to know Jesus, not just understand facts about him. I want to be with him, not just do stuff for him. The doing is needed, but it is not enough. Doing stuff is easier for me, just like masturbation can be easier than initiating sex. The former involves no mystery; do this and get a predictable result. There is no mystery in wrapping cables; there is also no deep satisfaction. When I smoke a cigar with Chris, and know the conversation could go anywhere, and that I am willing for it to do so, there is more mystery and more satisfaction than in a we need to talk conversation. And I?m finding that the more I just be with her, the less we need the we need to talk talks, because when we are together (cigars or no) we talk about the we need to talk topics before they get to a we need to talk point. But I didn?t intend to talk about Chris, I?m talking about God, but thinking about my relationship with Chris is helpful. My relationship with Chris is somewhat analogous to my relationship with Jesus -- except that He is my (the Church?s) groom, but that?s another story. There is similarity between my relationship with Chris and with Jesus. And thinking about intimacy in my marriage may help me understand intimacy with God, so that I can better know that intimacy. To be continued ...

February 11, 2009

On Humility

Filed under: Jesus Shaped Faith — DRobinson @ 6:47 pm
I've been reading/ listening to CS Lewis' The Screwtape Letters. I hit a section yesterday that got me thinking. It's a word picture of true humility.
[God] wants to bring a man [or woman] to a state of mind in which he could design the best cathedral in the world, and know it to be the best, and rejoice in the, fact, without being any more (or less) or otherwise glad at having done it than he would be if it had been done by another. [God] wants him, in the end, to be so free from any bias in his own favour that he can rejoice in his own talents as frankly and gratefully as in his neighbour's talents—or in a sunrise, an elephant, or a waterfall. He wants each man, in the long run, to be able to recognise all creatures (even himself) as glorious and excellent things.
 Humility is not "pretty women trying to believe they are ugly and clever men trying to believe they are fools." More than "a low opinion of [one's] own talents and character," humility is  "self-forgetfulness."  God would rather a man "thought himself a great architect or a great poet and then forgot about it, than that he should spend much time and pains trying to think himself a bad one."  What a good and true view of ourselves! And how rare. We have been taken in by Screwtape's ploys to get us either seeing ourselves better (false pride) or worse (false humility) than we really are. In either case, we are thinking about ourselves and our standing too much, and we are focusing on a false view of ourselves. Here is the key. Whether we have false pride or false humility, we are out of touch with reality. I want to be real, true, honest with myself and others. Lewis says true humility is to acknowledge what is real and true, to rejoice in it, and to be able to recognise all creatures (myself included) as glorious and excellent things.   (more...)

February 6, 2009

Especially Fond

Filed under: Jesus Shaped Faith — DRobinson @ 6:02 pm
I'm a word boy; I don't usually think in pictures. But last night, as I was praying for a friend, I saw what I was praying about. I saw God, ... sort of. I saw an older man talking with a younger man, but knew it was Jesus and the Father. They were looking down, I assume, at my friend Britt. Britt was not visible, just these two talking about him, and I could overhear parts of their conversation. Jesus would nudge His Father and say, "Abba, did you see the way Britt caught the light with those brush strokes? Wasn't that neat!" And the Father would say, "And did you see that smile when he was talking to his boy Al? That looked like your smile. He takes after you when he smiles like that." Then, "Abba, he really screwed up just then. He's such a knucklehead, but I am so pleased with how quick he was to turn from that and ask you for forgiveness." The Father smiled a big, slow smile and said, "Yeah, that's my boy Britt. I'm especially fond of that one!"  I'd been praying that Britt would be reminded, no, that he would know deep down how precious he is to God. How no matter what, God is especially fond of him. (more...)

February 1, 2009

It that “really” what happened?

Filed under: Jesus Shaped Faith — DRobinson @ 5:13 pm
I've been reading/ listening to CS Lewis' The Screwtape Letters. The other day another passage struck me as "so true." In this letter, Screwtape discussed how we humans are "completely fogged about the meaning of the word 'real.'" which now has two almost opposite  meanings: 1) the facts of the situation, and 2) one's emotional response to the situation.
So we "tell each other of some great spiritual experience, 'all that really happened was that [we]  heard some music in a nicely lighted building.' ... On the other hand, [we'll] say, 'It's all very well discussing that high dive as you sit there in an armchair, but wait till you're up there and see what it's really like.' [the tendency is] in all experiences that can make [us] happier or better, only the physical facts are real, while in all experiences which can discourage or corrupt, the spiritual (emotional) elements are the main reality, and to ignore them is to be escapist. Thus in birth, the blood and pain are real, the rejoicing is just a subjective point of view; in death, the terror and ugliness reveal what death really means."
It got me thinking, wondering how to talk about reality. Both aspects, the facts and the feelings, make up the experience of a situation for us.  In most cases, both are part of the reality of any situation. As one who wants to be in tune with reality and with the Real One,  I want and need to be aware of both in my own story, and to discount neither when others tell their story.   
Reference: In the linked copy from The Complete C.S. Lewis Signature Classics, on Google Book Search, see letter #30, on p. 185-186.

September 23, 2008

“Love is blind.” Not!

Filed under: Family n Friends, Jesus Shaped Faith — DRobinson @ 8:22 am
"I wish I didn?t know now, what I didn?t know then." So goes the Toby Keith song. There is a conventional wisdom that in many situations, it's better not to know; "ignorance is bliss." But when Thomas Gray penned the words, "where ignorance is bliss, tis folly to be wise", he was not saying ignorance is better than folly, but that it is less painful, but only for a time. Ignorance, not knowing, is often misalignment with reality. My wife is fond of saying, "Reality is our friend." And I agree. Having our thinking aligned with reality, with truth, really does set us free. What got me thinking about this was a discussion I had about a prayer that the biblical writer Paul prays for his friends in his letter to the Philippians. He prays for them: "That your love may abound more and more in knowledge and depth of insight, so that you will be able to discern what is best." (Philippians 1) Paul would say, "I'm glad I know now, what I didn't know then" even if, as Gray was talking about, the knowledge is painful. Paul juxtaposes love and knowledge, a rare combination. He prays that love may abound in knowledge. Knowledge is organized information; acquaintance with facts, truths or principles; aligning ideas about a thing to the facts. So here, Paul is asking God to help his friends to be knowledgeable, to be able to grasp and remember the facts, to think clearly. However, he doesn't want them to just be know-it-alls. Paul also asks for depth of insight. Insight is the power of acute observation and deduction; the clear understanding of a complex situation; grasping the inner nature of things intuitively. The objective of this knowledge and understanding is discernment of what is best, making wise choices in difficult decisions. Discernment is understanding; perception of that which is obscure; discretion (wise judgement); discrimination (perceiving differences that exist). In addition to having broad knowledge, Paul wants his friends to be able to use the knowledge with deep  understanding. This is not just a passive knowing, but wisdom that can actively guide good decisions. This is a huge issue for me. Part of the pose that developed out of my woundedness was a reluctance, almost an inability to make some decisions. In talking about this with a friend recently, we both realized that for him in certain situations and for me in most situations, we find we have no opinion. We do not take a stand. Why would a man, who has knowledge and understanding in most situations be either clueless or frozen in the place where those are needed to make a decision? We realized that in my case it stems from a strength and my response to a wound. The that response is an unwillingness (which morphed over time into an inability) to extend myself. It's an unwillingness to place myself in a position to be disappointed, to be hurt, or to lose. So rather than face life with an open posture, I have unconsciously held myself and my heart close. In insulating myself from pain, I also lost much of my ability to step up with a decision. I could usually see the options, but was unable to choose between them with any sense of certainty. Now one of my strengths is to listen and understand others. I can listen to one side of an issue and understand why he has decided that way. I can follow his reasoning and say, "He has a good point there." Then when an opposing view is presented, I follow it, and think, "On the other hand, she makes a good point, too." This is a real gift and strength. It often enables me to be objective and empathetic, even in impassioned discussions. It sometimes lets me build bridges between folks. But in many situations where decisiveness is needed, where I need to take a stand, I might as well flip a coin. My decider got lost long ago. So what's love got to do, got to do with this? Paul doesn't say, "That you may abound more and more in knowledge and depth of insight." He says, instead, "That your love may abound more and more in knowledge and depth of insight." Love and knowledge are juxtaposed here. How do they fit? The word that is translated love here is not our typical brotherly affection or erotic love. The Greek word Paul uses is agape: giving love. Agape is love that actively extends itself; gives itself on behalf of the other; risks for the other. It considers the other's needs as more important than one's own. With this understanding of agape love, it becomes clearer that If I am to really seek another's good, I need to know enough of the facts of their situation and back-story to understand why they think and feel the way they do. To love well, then, I need to know the other well enough to have insight about what will benefit them. But knowing all this isn't enough. I sometimes need to take a stand and act on behalf of another. I need learn to be decisive; having discernment to take my knowledge and insight about a situation and translate that into a decision, into action. Active love takes risks where the potential benefit to the other outweighs the risk to oneself. And for me, this is is a scary thought. You "Type-A" folks will say, "So what's the big deal? Just decide, will you!"  But that's easier said than done for someone with years of complacency -- note I said complacency and not indecisiveness. An indecisive person weighs the situation and is unable to decide between the options. The choice is too much for him. A complacent person may see options out there, but doesn't enter into the process. The effort is too much for him. So that comes back to love, doesn't it? If I love a person, and know that person, I need to be willing to extend myself, to risk making decisions, to act on their behalf. There are times when I need to do the mental, emotional, and sometimes spiritual work necessary to take a stand, make a decision, act. Complacency just can't be my default setting. But it will take work to get there. But in my opinion (I said "opinion"! Did you hear that?) it'll be worth it. I'm not sure what my next step is, but I do have the goal in mind. Maybe my next step is to take a step toward that goal. It is encouraging that a few verses earlier in Philippians 1, Paul says that he is "confident of this, that he [God] who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion." So though I'm not sure how to move ahead, I'll ask "he, who" what to do next.   I'll tell you how it goes. -----------

August 10, 2008

on Pain and Glory

Filed under: Jesus Shaped Faith — DRobinson @ 12:00 am
While talking with a group of guys, we were thinking about some really difficult situations a couple of them were facing. As encouragement, one friend brought up Romans 8 where the writer says, "For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worth comparing with the glory that is to be revealed to us..."   (Romans 8: 18 ff)   I got to wondering why/ how we find comfort and help from a passage like Romans 8. A verse like this can often seem like a pat answer, like  applying a bandaid, like “pie in the sky” thinking, without really dealing with the heart issues. What was up with Paul that his sufferings were so small compared to some future hope? I know that for me, in the middle of hard times, my world narrows to a tiny point a focus on my Painful Reality. So how was Paul, who wrote Romans, able to see a vista broader than his pain? Paul says our sufferings pale in comparison to the glory that is to be revealed. When my pain is all I can see, how can he say to me, "For this light momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison." (2 Corinthians 4:17) Light momentary affliction?! Was he just blowing smoke?  Was he in denial of his own Painful Reality?   (more...)

August 7, 2008

Oh .. my .. dog!

Filed under: Jesus Shaped Faith — DRobinson @ 11:05 am
Have you heard the one about the dyslexic, agnostic insomniac? He couldn't sleep for wondering if there really is a doG. Yeah, yeah, old joke, but I love it. And I've been thinking about my dog, Shadow and about God. I have a dog who is just a delight to be with, and who delights in being with me. He enjoys a walk or a ride in the car -- he gets all wiggly when he sees me grab the leash. He loves to just sit and be touched: petting, ear scratching, head rubbing, face stroking, whatever. He'll sit at my feet and soak in the attention and the touch. Right now, he's lying on the floor about three feet from my chair; last night, he lay between the chair and my footstool. He just loves to be close. We don't have to be "doing" anything. He just wants to be nearby; he is well named Shadow. He is a dog, and he loves to get scraps from anything I eat, and I do toss him some more often than I should. He'll sit and watch a person eat, but none of that whining or begging like those other dogs do. Just sitting, watching, waiting, hoping. And he'll go away or lie down if we tell him to, at least for a while. He knows we don't like to be whined or pawed at, and he really wants to please. He'd rather be praised than eat. We're trying to keep him off the furniture, now that we have some new furniture. And he means well, but he's seven years old, middle aged like me, and he has always lay on the love-seat. He does mean well, but sometimes his old habit makes him "forget" about the new furniture. If I catch him on the couch, he'll jump right down and look wretched, tail between his legs, looking down then looking up at me from a sort of twisted-body posture, like "Aw, David, (look down, twist) I forgot again. (turn his head to look at me sideways) Why'd I go and do that? Will you still scratch behind my ears? (hopeful stare)" Like I said, he really means well... One of his rituals is to run to the stair-railing when he hears me coming in from the garage after work. He sticks his head under the railing right on the floor. There is just room for his nose. His whole head won't fit under. He lies there waiting for me to scratch his nose, and stroke his face, and -- of course -- scratch his ears. Now the other day when I came home, there was no Shadow at the railing. He was across the room looking guilty. You know the look. I walked over to the couch, faux suede, and there were paw prints. I looked at him and he looked .. uh .. uncomfortable. I pointed to the couch and said, "No!" Now here was the moment. This is it, whether it's with a dog, or our kids, or friends, or as we relate to God. He was looking down, but his eyes were flipping from looking away to looking at me, like he was watching table tennis. He so much wanted it to be ok. He offered his miserable self to me and waited. He longed for me to make it ok, and he knew it was my call. And I did call him over and he sat before me and we had a good time of ear scratching and tail wagging and hand licking. Psalm 123 says,
To you I lift up my eyes, O you who are enthroned in the heavens! Behold, as the eyes of servants  look to the hand of their master, as the eyes of a maidservant to the hand of her mistress, so our eyes look to the LORD our God,  till he has mercy upon us.
The writer of Psalm 123 knew about this watching and waiting for it to be ok. Why does my dog lift up his eyes to me, till I have mercy upon him? Is it that Shadow knows the answer before he "asks"? Is it that somehow he has learned that he can trust me, even with his miserable self? Shadow has learned a secret to contentment. -- And if you watch this dog, you'll see he is content. To him, being related to me is more important than food or couches or anything else. It's not that he is worried about the rule, "Stay off the couch." He just knows that being on the couch doesn't please me; it can stand between him and my pleasure. He so delights in my pleasure, my touch, my presence, that he wants to "follow the rule' for the closeness. Now I love this dog. As Papa says in The Shack, "I'm especially fond of that one." And his being on the couch isn't a concern for me in terms of my fondness for Shadow. When I see my him on the couch, I love that dog, and smile at myself trying to teach an old dog a new trick. And I smile at him in his forgetfulness. And I smile knowing how sad he's going to be -- sad because he so wants to please me. And about how happy he will be when I scratch his ears. In this case, the "rule" really has more to do with other home values than about Shadow at all. It's certainly not there just to cramp his style. He may not understand why he can't get on the new couch now, when he could get on the old couch then. But he doesn't have to understand. He's a dog, after all. How much can he understand, anyway? He just knows that he can lie almost anywhere in the house: on the floor right in front of that delightful cool air thingie, on the kitchen floor that is always cool and nice, in the window seat where he can watch those birds come just outside to eat! (And he can understand that the glass is really there. The cat, on the other hand,...) Shadow has broad possibilities, and a narrow restriction. His obedience or disobedience about the couch doesn't affect my love for him. But I do want him to learn this one thing, so I enforce the restriction. And though I know it hurts him, I am happy when he feels ashamed about messing up again. It's not that I'm a masochist and want to see him suffer guilt. I'm happy because by his sadness, I can see how important our relationship is, how important pleasing me is, how important my forgiveness is to him. His sadness shows both him and me, that our relationship is far more important than a couch to lie on. Shadow somehow just knows that his contentment lies in his closeness to me: sometimes in physical closeness with petting and touching and all, but more often in emotional closeness, with nothing standing between us. Right now, Shadow is sacked out in front of the air conditioning vent, chillin. A few minutes ago, he came over and lay his snout on my chair for me to rub his head. He is content that he can do those things, that he is safe and welcome with me. And I am delighted in him because he wants to be near me more than anything else. Yep, I'm especially fond of that one!

August 3, 2008

Written and Directed

Filed under: Jesus Shaped Faith — DRobinson @ 5:31 pm
This morning, the guys and I were talking about our tendency to try to re-write the script of our lives. We keep editing the scenes, trying to make ourselves look better or sound more together. That conversation was ironic because the other night, at home we watched The Life and Death of Peter Sellers. That film shows Sellers editing every script he received, while at the same time losing not only the plot of his life, but also losing all sense of identity. He did not know who he was apart from the film roles he had so masterfully crafted. I've spent a lot of effort trying to edit my life -- as the guys fondly quote Eldredge, creating a nice little life for myself. So much so, for years I failed to really live it. I believed the Gospel had saved me from my sins, but I had stopped believing that it had any power for my life, or that God cared much about me one way or the other. However, that's changing. I have lately begun to see that God is actually quite fond of me. When I see God and his plans for me as really really good, I can get beyond the "what-ifs" and be satisfied with the plot and how he's written my character because I know and trust the writer. He's given me great freedom with my lines and cues,
Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress